• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Net neutrality: Why we need regulation

By
Albert Wenger
Albert Wenger
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Albert Wenger
Albert Wenger
Down Arrow Button Icon
January 17, 2014, 6:57 PM ET

FORTUNE — We live in the Chelsea part of Manhattan, which in turn is part of New York City, one of the iconic cities of the U.S. And arguably the world. We have exactly one broadband provider available at our address. There is zero competition. Never mind an oligopoly or a duopoly. Broadband for us is a monopoly. And that’s exactly why net neutrality matters, as much of the U.S. Finds itself in a similar situation.

A competition based solution to net neutrality is simply not possible given the current market structure. If there were half a dozen or more options to choose from and broadband providers were competing along multiple dimensions — including how neutral or not they are — then maybe the market could take care of it. But that is not the world we actually live in. Which is not to say that we shouldn’t work towards that world by making more unlicensed spectrum available and stringing/using municipal fiber. But as far as net neutrality is concerned in the here and now we need regulation.

RELATED: Why the man who coined the phrase ‘net neutrality’ feared Apple

If the federal government fails to do this, then cities and states should take the leadership.

Many of the providers have their current monopolies under some degree of local licensing. Wherever and whenever possible, such licensing should be revised to ensure net neutrality. A model in which bandwidth is paid for twice, once by the customer through their monthly fee and once by content providers, not only unreasonably enriches monopoly providers but will deeply entrench incumbent companies, as my partner Fred Wilson pointed out.

Beyond that we are on a super slippery slope where the next step would be outright filtering by broadband providers (as we are seeing in the UK). Once neutrality goes with regard to bandwidth there is really no reason why a site should be accessible at all!

As I wrote in one of my first posts of the year, keeping the Internet open will be one of the central issue of 2014. The court decision striking down the FCC’s attempt to provide for broadband net neutrality should be a wake up call for everyone.

Albert Wenner (@albertwenger) is a partner with Union Square Ventures. This post originally appeared on his blog.

About the Author
By Albert Wenger
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.