• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
RetailApple

Federal judge certifies class action lawsuit against Apple

By
Claire Groden
Claire Groden
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Claire Groden
Claire Groden
Down Arrow Button Icon
July 16, 2015, 4:06 PM ET
First Apple Store In South America Opens In Rio de Janeiro
RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL - FEBRUARY 15: A customer (C) celebrates after entering Brazil's first Apple retail store minutes after it opened to the public for the first time in the Village Mall shopping center on February 15, 2014 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The store is a 'pavilion' design with a 100-foot curved glass panel in front and opens to the public four months before the 2014 FIFA World Cup. It is Apple's first physical store in South America. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)Mario Tama / Getty Images

Apple retail workers were given the go-ahead in federal court in California Thursday to pursue a class action lawsuit against Apple, breathing new life into a lawsuit filed in 2013.

The ruling, from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco, concerns a lawsuit that alleges Apple (AAPL) should compensate store workers for the time taken to search their bags to make sure they did not steal any merchandise.

The plaintiffs, Amanda Frlekin and Dean Pelle, are seeking $5 million in lost overtime wages for the class members, which include more than 12,000 current and former Apple employees. They allege that workers were subject to twice daily checks of their personal bags by their supervisors, which not only took up a lot of time since employees often had to wait in line, but were also demeaning, since they were often performed in front of customers.

One employee, who wrote an email to CEO Tim Cook with the subject line “Fearless Feedback from Apple Retail Specialist,” wrote that managers “are required to treat ‘valued’ employees as criminals.”

Apple argued that the case was not eligible for a class action lawsuit, since not all store managers conducted the searches.

The case was previously dismissed by the same judge in 2014. That ruling followed a Supreme Court decision on a similar case. The Supreme Court had ruled against Amazon (AMZN) employees who sued the company’s temp agency for overtime wages earned while waiting in line for security checks.

About the Author
By Claire Groden
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.