• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
TechUber Technologies

Uber and Lyft are spending big bucks on lobbying in California

By
Kia Kokalitcheva
Kia Kokalitcheva
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Kia Kokalitcheva
Kia Kokalitcheva
Down Arrow Button Icon
August 24, 2015, 2:20 PM ET
Uber Tops Taxis
Uber driver Karim Amrani sits in his car parked near the San Francisco International Airport parking area in San Francisco, Wednesday, July 15, 2015. In the three months ended in June, Uber overtook taxis as the most expensed form of ground transportation, according to expense management system provider Certify. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)Photograph by Jeff Chiu — AP

It made sense when ride-hailing company Uber hired David Plouffe, President Obama’s 2008 campaign manager, last year — since regulatory acceptance is arguably its biggest challenge.

And where regulations need to be changed, lobbying efforts and money go. According to a report from Bloomberg, citing state records, Uber has spent $925,000 for lobbyists in California in the past two years, while Lyft has spent $362,000. For context, Facebook has spent $412,000 and Apple paid $353,000 in the same period.

Ride-hailing companies face a battery of regulatory hurdles all over the country and world. In California, these have centered around driver background checks, whether commercial licenses should be required for its UberX drivers (normal people using their own cars to ferry passengers), or whether drivers should be classified as employees.

While the employee status issue is currently making its way through the courts and the California Labor Commission issued a non-binding ruling last month that one former driver should have been classified as a company employee instead of a contractor, it’s won some fights in California and elsewhere. California Assemblyman Adrin Nazarian proposed a bill that would require drivers to get stricter background checks and drug tests, but the bill was shelved because of a lack of votes, according to Bloomberg. Last month, after a days-long campaign against New York City Mayor de Blasio’s proposed cap on the number of drivers ride-hailing companies can add every year, the two sides came to a compromise.

About the Author
By Kia Kokalitcheva
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.