• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Leadership

Democratic Candidates Are Sparring Over Unsanctioned Debate

By
Claire Groden
Claire Groden
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Claire Groden
Claire Groden
Down Arrow Button Icon
January 28, 2016, 10:24 AM ET
Democratic Presidential Candidates Hold First Debate In Las Vegas
LAS VEGAS, NV - OCTOBER 13: Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) (L) and Hillary Clinton take part in a presidential debate sponsored by CNN and Facebook at Wynn Las Vegas on October 13, 2015 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Five Democratic presidential candidates are participating in the party's first presidential debate. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)Photograph by Joe Raedle—Getty Images

An unsanctioned debate is sowing confusion among Democratic primary candidates.

On Wednesday, candidate Hillary Clinton called for Bernie Sanders to join her in attending a debate that the Democratic National Committee has not approved. Speaking on MSNBC’s Hardball, Clinton said she also wanted the DNC to approve the debate, which was proposed by MSNBC and the New Hampshire Union Leader Tuesday afternoon.

The night before, Sanders’ campaign manager had said Sanders did not plan to participate in the debate, adding, “we would not want to jeopardize our ability to participate in future debates.” The DNC has sanctioned six debates, and an exclusivity clause means that participating in unsanctioned events could disqualify candidates from DNC debates. The Sanders campaign said it would take a different stance on the Feb. 4 debate if the DNC signed off on it.

The unsanctioned debate comes amid Democratic voters’ dissatisfaction with the current schedule, which has featured infrequent debates at odd hours. Last week, Stephen Colbert joked that the DNC was “going to show the next Democratic debate after the closing credits of the Fantastic Four.”

But after MSNBC and the Times Union announced their proposed debate, DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Shultz issued a statement saying the committee has “no plans to sanction any further debates before the upcoming First in the Nation caucuses and primary.”

The proposed debate is an attempt to give voters more time to hear the candidates out, Trent Spiner, the Union Leader’s executive editor told The Hill. “People are saying to me, ‘We need another debate.’ We feel like it’s our job as a statewide newspaper to give the information that people need,” he said.

About the Author
By Claire Groden
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.