• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
HealthValeant Pharmaceuticals

Study Says This Cold Medicine Doesn’t Actually Fight Colds

By
Michal Addady
Michal Addady
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Michal Addady
Michal Addady
Down Arrow Button Icon
February 1, 2016, 3:09 PM ET
Views From A Shoppers Drug Mart Store Ahead Of Earns
An employee stocks shelves at a Shoppers Drug Mart Corp. store in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on Monday, Feb. 4, 2013. Shoppers Drug Mart Corp., Canada's largest pharmacy chain, is scheduled to release earnings data on Feb. 7. Photographer: Aaron Harris/Bloomberg via Getty ImagesPhotograph by Aaron Harris — Bloomberg via Getty Images

A newly revealed study shows that Cold-FX is ineffective as a cold and flu treatment.

The study was conducted in 2004, but the results had never been publicly available until they came up in a class-action lawsuit against Valeant Pharmaceuticals (VRX), the National Post reports. The class-action is being headed by attorney John Green and accuses the company of misleading consumers up until recently. Cold-FX was invented by Afexa Life Sciences, and Valeant now owns the product after purchasing Afexa in 2011.

The 2004 study, conducted by Dr. Gerry Predy who currently serves as Alberta’s senior medical officer of health, showed that Cold-FX doesn’t treat cold or flu symptoms, though it did work as a preventative measure. It found that if a person took the supplement every day for two or more months, it reduced the frequency and intensity of respiratory illnesses.

According to marketing for the product, Cold-FX could “stop cold and flu in their tracks,” and “help provide effective relief” and “immediate relief.” Though when Predy measured it up against a placebo as a treatment, the results for both were very similar with symptoms being more severe and lasting just a bit longer for those taking the medicine.

“If true, this kind of information should have been disclosed,” Green told the Post.

Pharmaceutical companies aren’t obligated to publish trial results in Canada, where the lawsuit is taking place. The company filed a report with Health Canada, but the government can’t publish that information publicly. Predy said he couldn’t remember if the study had been rejected from a scientific journal or if Afexa just didn’t submit it because “it was not likely to be published given the results.”

About the Author
By Michal Addady
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.