• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Tech

Here’s Why the FBI Went After Apple When It Did

By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
February 28, 2016, 9:16 AM ET

J. Edgar Hoover was a master at this game. The legendary FBI director would latch on to the latest boogeyman—the Lindbergh kidnapper, a big-name gangster, Nazi spies, Communists—and leverage the press coverage to extract more money from Congress for his growing crime-fighting enterprise.

Forgive me if I see shades of J. Edgar in the FBI’s latest budget request, submitted to Congress exactly one week before a terrorist’s iPhone became front page news.

There are hundreds of iPhones in police custody that the FBI can’t crack, but it’s not hard to see why the Department of Justice chose to make a federal case out of this one.

Subscribe to Data Sheet, Coins2Day ’s daily tech newsletter.

Here’s the sequence of events:

  • December 2, 2015: Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik perpetrate the deadliest terror attack on U.S. Soil since 9/11, leaving behind a locked iPhone the FBI can’t crack.
  • January 13: Apple’s hardened security measures come up at a Washington summit on strong crypto, CEO Tim Cook and Attorney General Loretta Lynch clash over “back doors.” Harsh words and warnings are exchanged.
  • February 9: Lynch requests an extra $38 million to help the FBI development workarounds on data encryption, bringing the total budget of what it calls “project Going Dark” to $69 million.
  • February 16: The DOJ takes Apple to court. Tim Cook responds, drawing a line in the sand.

There is much that I find duplicitous in the Justice’s Department’s latest brief in the case: That the FBI is only interested in this iPhone, no others. That creating a new version of iOS wouldn’t take much effort. That what they’re asking for is not a back door. That larger issues of privacy are not at stake.

But what I find particularly hypocritical is the DOJ’s suggestion that Apple (AAPL) is only concerned about its “business model” and “public brand marketing strategy.”

The FBI has a business model too. And with $38.3 million at stake, it knows a thing or two about public brand marketing.

For more on Apple vs. FBI, watch this video:

For a dose of sanity, I recommend James Allworth’s The U.S. Has Gone F&*%ing Mad, See especially the chart that compares American gun deaths vs. Terror deaths, 2004 to 2013.

About the Author
By Philip Elmer-DeWitt
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.