• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
TechIBM

New York Judge Throws Out Lawsuit Accusing IBM of Fraud

By
Reuters
Reuters
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Reuters
Reuters
Down Arrow Button Icon
September 7, 2016, 3:06 PM ET
A view of the IBM office in New York.
Ben Hider—Getty Images

IBM (IBM) on Wednesday won the dismissal of a pair of proposed class action lawsuits filed after the company in 2014 announced it would take a $2.4 billion write-down in connection with selling its semiconductor unit.

U.S. District Judge William Pauley in Manhattan in a pair of rulings dismissed an investor lawsuit accusing IBM of securities fraud, as well as a lawsuit brought on behalf of participants in a company 401(k) plan.

Neither IBM nor lawyers for the lead plaintiff in the investor lawsuit responded immediately to requests for comment.

The lawsuits stemmed from IBM’s Oct. 20, 2014 announcement that it would pay GlobalFoundries $1.5 billion to take over a money-losing unit that designed and produced microchips.

IBM also announced it would take a $2.4 billion write-down on the entire value of assets in the microelectronics unit, as well as $800 million of other unspecified costs.

The announcement was accompanied that day by IBM disclosing disappointing third-quarter financial results. Following the announcements, IBM stock dropped more than 17%, the plaintiffs said.

Investors led by KBC Asset Management NV contended IBM inflated its stock price before selling the unit by carrying the unit’s property, plant and equipment assets on its books at $2.4 billion, when the assets were actually worthless.

But Pauley said the lawsuit “fails to raise a strong inference” that the need to write-down the unit was so apparent to IBM before the October 2014 announcement that failure to take an earlier write-down constituted fraud.

The judge similarly granted IBM’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit by plaintiffs Larry Jander and Richard Waksman on behalf of participants in IBM’s 401(k) Plus Plan, though he said the could seek to file an amended complaint.

Sam Bonderoff, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, said while he was disappointed by the ruling, “we are gratified that it did so without prejudice, giving us leave to file an amended complaint, which we intend to do.”

About the Author
By Reuters
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.