• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
TechCoins2Day 500

Judge Bars Former Amazon Exec From Working at Competitor Startup

Barb Darrow
By
Barb Darrow
Barb Darrow
Down Arrow Button Icon
Barb Darrow
By
Barb Darrow
Barb Darrow
Down Arrow Button Icon
June 13, 2017, 8:10 AM ET

Gene Farrell, formerly a vice president at Amazon Web Services, cannot work at Smartsheet, a software startup, at least for now.

A King’s County Washington commissioner granted Amazon (AMZN) a temporary restraining order to keep Farrell, who become senior vice president of product for Smartsheet as of June 1, 2017, from assuming his duties. The news was first reported by tech site Geekwire and confirmed by Smartsheet late Monday.

AWS filed suit late last week to keep Farrell, who had been vice president of enterprise services at AWS, from working at Smartsheet, which AWS deems a competitor, for 18 months. The company alleges that Farrell cannot fulfill his new duties without breaching his AWS non-compete agreement by disclosing proprietary AWS information.

In this case, Kings County Commissioner Carols Velataqui’s ruling will hold for 11 days until another hearing by King County Superior Court Judge Jim Rogers, according to Geekwire.

Related: Non-Competes Are Bad for the Little Guy and Maybe for the Economy as a Whole

On Monday, Smartsheet CEO Mark Mader told Coins2Day that Smartsheet, which makes collaboration software for workgroups, does not compete with AWS.

Related: AWS Sets Sights On Microsoft Office

But Amazon’s cloud unit, which started out offering basic computing building blocks—servers, networking, and storage—to other companies, has been adding higher level software for business workers including WorkMail email and Chime conference calling. Many expect AWS will come out with productivity software that competes directly with Google (GOOG) G Suite and Microsoft (MSFT) Office 365.

Get Data Sheet, Coins2Day ’s technology newsletter.

Companies often require new hires to sign non-compete agreements as a condition of employment. The contracts are intended to keep the employee from working for a competitor for periods ranging from 12- to 18-months. Opponents say they limit employee mobility and productivity; proponents say companies should be able to reap the rewards of training employees.

About the Author
Barb Darrow
By Barb Darrow
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.