• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Retailnew balance

Why New Balance’s Trademark Infringement Victory in China Is Such a Big Deal

By
Natasha Bach
Natasha Bach
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Natasha Bach
Natasha Bach
Down Arrow Button Icon
August 23, 2017, 6:27 AM ET
CON15_A.tif
New Balance, Henkee and New Barlun sneakers on sale in Shanghai, China.Courtesy of New Balance

New Balance has won big in China.

A Chinese court ruled last week that three domestic companies infringed New Balance’s signature slanted “N” logo and owe the U.S. Shoe company $1.5 million in damages and legal costs. The case is reportedly the largest trademark infringement award ever granted to a foreign business in China.

While the sum New Balance won is not large by global standards, it points to a change in China’s attitude toward piracy and recent tweaks to its corresponding legislation. Before China passed a new trademark law in 2014, damages in infringement cases often fell below the maximum statutory amount of $75,000. The new legislation upped that amount to $ 450,000.

Read: Alibaba Is One Step Closer to Global Domination with Dismissal of Kering Lawsuit

In China, trademarks are awarded to the first company to file for them. Because of this, the three companies in question—New Boom, New Barlun, and New Bunren—are all protected. Yet according to a copy of the decision reviewed by the New York Times, New Boom “seized market share from New Balance and drastically damaged its business reputation.”

[Tempo-video id=”5480122012001″ account_id=”2111767321001″ autoplay=true]

This ruling offers hope not just to New Balance, but to other foreign companies operating in China. The shoe company’s previous efforts to confront counterfeiting there were not as successful. In 2015, for instance, it lost a lawsuit against a man who registered the Chinese name for New Balance. But things seem to be looking up following this most recent ruling. As New Balance’s senior counsel for intellectual property Daniel McKinnon told the New York Times, the decision has given the company “a renewed confidence in our aggressive intellectual-property protection strategy within China.” It’s likely other foreign companies will feel the same way.

About the Author
By Natasha Bach
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.