• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Techdata protection

Google Faces a Fresh Privacy Class Action Suit Over Tracking iPhone Safari Users

By
David Meyer
David Meyer
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
David Meyer
David Meyer
Down Arrow Button Icon
November 30, 2017, 6:56 AM ET

A veteran consumer advocate has filed a groundbreaking lawsuit against Google in the U.K., over the company’s circumvention of privacy protections in Apple’s Safari browser years ago.

Between June 2011 and February 2012, Google bypassed the browser’s anti-tracking protections to collect browsing information from users. It has already paid tens of millions to settle the resulting suits in the U.S., and now it faces a type of class action in the U.K.

This is the first time someone has launched a “representative action” in the U.K. In a case involving data protection abuses. The suit is being organized by Richard Lloyd, a former Downing Street advisor who also led consumer association Which? From 2011 to 2016. His action is backed to the tune of £15.5 million by litigation-funder Therium.

Lloyd, who has set up a group called Google You Owe Us, is suing on behalf of all iPhone users who were in England and Wales during the affected time period. To qualify for a payout if he wins, people have to have used Safari during the period with the default security settings, and not opted out of Google’s tracking within Google’s own systems. They also have to have been resident in England and Wales on 31 May this year.

Read: Google’s New App Helps Phone Users in Emerging Markets Monitor Their Data Usage

Anyone who meets the criteria is automatically included in Lloyd’s suit, although if he wins they must register to collect their cash. Lloyd reckons around 5.4 million people could claim £200 ($269) each, which would mean a bill for Google (GOOGL) in excess of £1 billion.

Google, meanwhile, said it has “defended similar cases before,” doesn’t believe the case has any merit, and will contest it.

Privacy advocates have indeed already sued Google over the matter in the U.K. The case of Vidal Hall v Google was much smaller in scale, involving three individuals, and it resulted in a confidential settlement. However, the Court of Appeal said at the time that the facts of the case merited a full trial.

About the Author
By David Meyer
LinkedIn icon
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.