• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

University Fined for Misplacing Small Amount of Weapons-Grade Plutonium

By
Sarah Gray
Sarah Gray
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Sarah Gray
Sarah Gray
Down Arrow Button Icon
May 8, 2018, 2:17 PM ET
Zwischenlager Nord Temporary Nuclear Waste Storage Facility
LUBMIN, GERMANY - JULY 25: A symbol for radioactivity is visible on a radioactively-contaminated container once used to transport nuclear fuel rods at the nearby Greifswald former nuclear power plant at the Zwischenlager Nord temporary nuclear waste storage facility on July 25, 2013 in Lubmin, Germany. The Zwischenlager Nord, run by Energiewerke Nord GmbH, contains low, medium and high radioactive waste as well as spent nuclear fuel rods from both west and east German nuclear power plants and research reactors.(Photo by Thomas Trutschel/Photothek via Getty Images)Thomas Trutschel Photothek via Getty Images

Idaho State University is being fined $8,500 by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for misplacing a gram of weapons-grade nuclear material.

“The NRC has very rigorous controls for the use and storage of radioactive materials as evidenced by this enforcement action,” the agency’s spokesperson Victor Dricks told the Associated Press, saying the missing amount wasn’t enough to make a nuclear weapon but could be used to make a dirty bomb or spread contamination.

The school works with U.S. Department of Energy’s Idaho National Laboratory, and in general the university has “a good record with the NRC,” according to Dricks.

The university reported the small amount of plutonium 239, “about the size of a U.S. Quarter,” according to the AP, missing in October 2017. While doing an inventory check, a university employee discovered that only 13 of 14 small samples of the material could be accounted for. The last documentation of the missing plutonium sample is from 2003 and 2004 when it was set to be disposed. However, it’s unclear if it was disposed.

“Unfortunately, because there was a lack of sufficient historical records to demonstrate the disposal pathway employed in 2003, the source in question had to be listed as missing,” Dr. Cornelis Van der Schyf, the university’s vice president of research, told the AP. “The radioactive source in question poses no direct health issue or risk to public safety.”

About the Author
By Sarah Gray
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.