• Home
  • News
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Commentarydiversity and inclusion

For Black entrepreneurs, inequality starts with the pre-seed round

By
Lyneir Richardson
Lyneir Richardson
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Lyneir Richardson
Lyneir Richardson
Down Arrow Button Icon
September 15, 2021, 6:00 AM ET
Building a business is a marathon, but some of us have a head start.
Building a business is a marathon, but some of us have a head start.David Dee Delgado—Getty Images

Keith Kirkland is a Black entrepreneur. He and a partner devised the wearable technology that enabled a blind man to run the New York City Marathon with no other navigation assistance. That exciting proof of concept opened doors to other “GPS you can feel” applications. Their company, WearWorks, has attracted investment capital to hire, scale, and solve more problems. 

It’s a great story of entrepreneurship, but here’s a question it raises: Why aren’t there more Keith Kirklands getting early-stage equity capital? Statistics show that while the rate of entrepreneurship has been higher among Black Americans than in the white population in recent years, their businesses on average stay smaller. The vast majority do not have even a single employee beyond the owner. What’s holding these entrepreneurs back is a puzzle that people committed to racial economic justice and city leaders striving to boost their economies have been trying to solve for years.

Most of their programs assume it’s a shortfall in personal capacities. Many urban areas have startup boot camps and technical assistance programs, for example, where local minority entrepreneurs participate in intensive programs, learning to pitch for funding, training in customer validation processes, and building leadership skills. All that is essential to the success equation. These programs alone are insufficient. 

The crucial missing element is phase 1 of capital raising—and unfortunately, it’s this first ladder rung providing access to the rest. It’s what venture capitalists call the friends and family round or “pre-seed” capital. More than any other investor money, it’s patient, optimistic, and non-extractive. Getting money at this stage requires knowing people with funds who understand business fundamentals and believe in you as an entrepreneur. They’d like their money back once the business is on firm footing but aren’t necessarily asking for an ownership stake.

In the context of a long history of racial discrimination and systemic inequality, most Black entrepreneurs still don’t have rich uncles and trust-fund friends. Banks generally don’t lend to startups, unless the loan is secured by an asset. The Pew Research Center reports that the median white household has 20 times as much wealth as the median Black household. Thus, capable Black people can’t get pre-seed capital and give up on promising startups before even getting a chance to succeed.

This is not a doom and gloom story, because there’s a solution—a movement to institutionalize the friends and family round for Black entrepreneurs. Financially savvy people are taking something once done informally, and structuring it, reducing risk, and making it an option for “philanthropically motivated impact investors.” 

The idea is getting traction because it responds to those individuals and corporations that want to fund Black businesses instead of only making donations to social justice initiatives. These impact investors believe that business owners will create jobs and strengthen communities. They are willing to help Black entrepreneurs get started and grow.

Institutionalizing the friends and family round means creating intermediaries that investors can trust to surface promising startup concepts and make connections. These go-between institutions see a lot of pitches, assess risk and potential, structure transactions, and monitor progress. Yes, they also build capacity and provide mentoring to make entrepreneurs more capable—but the focus is on managing money flows, addressing tax issues, and doing the impact reporting desired by the investor. 

Some intermediaries provide the pre-seed capital, often through awards at pitch competitions. In Keith Kirkland’s case, a $10,000 award from the Rutgers Center for Urban Entrepreneurship and Economic Development catalyzed a $25,000 investment from the Black and Latino Angel Investment Fund of New Jersey. This helped put WearWorks on the radar for an investment syndicate that collectively kicked in $115,000 more.

A whole range of vehicles are being deployed. In Newark, pitch contests and angel funds sit alongside other components in a larger Black and Latino Tech Initiative. Rutgers formed a flexible capital fund that makes 0% interest loans and offers an efficient process connecting Black entrepreneurs to Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs). 

Rutgers is hardly the only institution acting in this space. In Asheville, N.C., Black businesses can get revenue-based financing from the Community Equity Fund. In New York, Ascendus offers special-purpose-vehicle loan programs and grants. In Chicago, Greenwood Archer Capital recently rebranded itself, emphasizing its commitment to “funding equity” for Black entrepreneurs. 

In a society energized to address inequities, this is a front we can collectively make fast progress on. The key is to focus on building equity to help promising startups get early-stage capital. If we provide early money to help Black entrepreneurs innovate and grow businesses, we can close the racial wealth gap. To the extent that profitable businesses and appreciating property are passed along to a business owner’s heirs, intergenerational wealth will be a reality in Black families.

Lyneir Richardson, executive director of the Center for Urban Entrepreneurship and Economic Development and assistant professor of professional practice, Rutgers Business School, Newark location.

More must-read commentary published by Coins2Day:

  • What COVID-19 will look like 10 years from now
  • This is not a repeat of the 2008 housing bubble
  • Why does the “return to work” make us so uneasy?
  • To build back better, we need better data about the developing world
  • The best way to protect against “strategic” cybercrime? Keep moving your data

Subscribe to Coins2Day Daily to get essential business stories straight to your inbox each morning.

About the Author
By Lyneir Richardson
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Coins2Day 500
  • Global 500
  • Coins2Day 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Coins2Day Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Coins2Day Brand Studio
  • Coins2Day Analytics
  • Coins2Day Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Coins2Day
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Coins2Day Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Coins2Day Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.