In May, Coins2Day published its annual Coins2Day 500 list, with some initially promising headlines touting “record numbers” of women and Black executives running Coins2Day 500 companies.
However, the reality is much clearer as you read further. A mere 1.2% of these CEOs–six out of 500–are Black. Two of these leaders, Roz Brewer of Walgreens Boots Alliance and Thasunda Brown Duckett of TIAA-CREF, are also included among the women who make up 8.8%of the 500 largest companies’ CEOs.
In the 2020 U.S. Census, women constituted 58.7% of the civilian labor force. Persons identifying themselves solely as African American make up 13.4% of the total population. In this context, the underrepresentation of women and people of color at the top of the Coins2Day 500 is especially stark. This is an urgent matter.
Why is change at the top so hard? To start, there’s a glaring lack of diversity in the leadership pipelines of large companies, which limits options in CEO selection. According to a 2020 Stanford University study of Coins2Day 100 companies, leaders from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups hold just 13% of C-suite positions with high potential for CEO and board recruitment.
Changing this status quo requires boards, CEOs, and CHROs to reframe how they manage their CEO search and succession planning. Increased diversity among CEOs will not happen overnight, but these leaders can take active steps today to cultivate more diverse pools of CEO-ready candidates, and effect real change in the next three, five, and 10 years. Here are six key areas to focus on.
Set intentional objectives
Leaders charged with finding a new CEO must be explicit from the outset that they expect an inclusive process that includes a diverse slate of the highest-caliber talent at every stage. In doing this, they push their teams and advisors to examine what is essential in the role and to look creatively for the next generation of leadership.
Across multiple companies and industries, we’ve seen the power of this intention in action. When boards were explicit that their organization would only consider a diverse slate of the highest qualified leaders, it compelled everyone involved in finding and developing candidates to look beyond the “usual suspects” and search more broadly for excellence. It also expanded the future talent pool and tested assumptions against strategic objectives. Putting institutional credibility behind the need for a diverse slate of the most-qualified candidates is an essential first step.
Build a diverse pipeline earlier
Decision-makers also need to address this problem inside their organizations earlier by defining the common routes to the CEO job and ensuring there are diverse pools of the best talent at each stage. To this end, they must cast a wide net to look beyond the most-likely successors to include high-potential, seemingly long-shot possibilities–people who could become the right choice given their development trajectory and circumstances.
Sitting CEOs play a critical role here as the connective tissue between boards and potential successors. The CEO is the one closest to the ground, and what they say about up-and-coming talent, and how they are developing, carries significant weight.
Beware tokenism and the ‘status quo effect‘
Boards, sitting CEOs, and CHROs must rigorously manage the overall diversity of the candidate pool throughout the entire process to mitigate what is known as the “status quo effect.”
Research demonstrates that the presence of only a single member of a different group emphasizes the “otherness” of that candidate and signals tokenism, thus heightening the sense of perceived risk in choosing that person for the role.
Assess for potential, not just experience
It’s commonly assumed that experience is the best predictor of success, which creates a bias in favor of prior CEO experience when selecting a new CEO.
However, our research shows there is no premium for prior CEO experience after the first four years in the role. Given the lack of diversity in C-suite feeder roles, focusing exclusively on experience constrains the candidate pool. Widening the lens to seriously consider high-potential leaders who may bring non-traditional experiences and perspectives is a must.
In today’s landscape, agility, humility, empathy, and resilience are essential leadership traits that aren’t guaranteed by experience alone.
Mitigate bias through education and vigilance
An objective assessment approach minimizes the opportunities for biases to impact the search process adversely.
However, even in the best circumstances, we’ve witnessed bias in the boardroom. Directors must be willing to challenge these faulty assumptions. The organization’s inclusive values are strengthened when CEOs and board chairs lead by example. Integrating implicit bias training into the succession process also expands perspectives and adds a crucial layer of process integrity.
Support for success
Finally, once a new CEO has been selected, those managing the transition should identify the support the new leader will need to be successful. Embracing a new role and integrating into a new team is a challenge for even experienced CEOs.
Careful planning, an explicit and deliberate onboarding plan, and effective coaching for the new leader will help the board and the executive leadership team to better engage and welcome the change that comes as part of a natural organizational and leadership evolution.
John Harpole, Cathy Anterasian, Robert Stark, and Kathy Schnure are consultants at Spencer Stuart. Hannah Ford is a senior associate at Spencer Stuart.
The opinions expressed in Coins2Day.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of Coins2Day.
More must-read commentary published by Coins2Day:
- What the media gets wrong in its persistent crypto criticism
- The gun industry’s deadly lie
- A list of companies supporting abortion rights after the Roe v. Wade ruling shows which firms are stepping up, and why
- Career hoarding is on the rise—but it comes at a cost
- Are billionaires just lucky?
