The core purpose of American universities is the pursuit and dissemination of knowledge. Yet in an economy that changes rapidly, it's becoming out of sync with the market it's supposed to support.
Increasing college costs, falling student numbers, and unsatisfactory post-graduation job prospects have caused many to doubt if higher education still fulfills its commitment. Many smaller organizations are closing their doors or merging as they struggle with escalating expenses and declining interest. This is not a case of isolated incidents. These indicate that a system requires a fundamental overhaul.
The true difficulty, though, lies within. It is inherent in the structure. For universities to sustain their relevance in a competitive, post-industrial economy, they need to move beyond considering themselves as isolated entities to Acknowledging its place within the wider talent acquisition network.
This transformation demands more than just minor adjustments to existing processes. It necessitates a fundamental reconsideration of what matters most.
For decades, academic institutions have maintained a distance from the commercial sector, based on the principle that their aim is to nurture Pursuing erudition for its inherent worth. The prevailing wisdom was theoretical. The practical application was frequently seen as secondary, or even worse, as mere vocational training. However, the global landscape has transformed. Student expectations have evolved as well.
Graduates today need to be adaptable and have practical experience to succeed in the current job market. New entrants to the job market often face significant debt and lack the immediate skills needed for productive contribution. Students and their families are starting to inquire more deeply. Companies are also growing weary. This is precisely what we should expect. The realm of higher education is in dire need of a significant change in direction.
A cautious approach is often taken at numerous institutions towards the concept of tighter collaboration with industry. Certain individuals perceive it as a weakening of scholarly objectives or a danger to faculty autonomy. For some, the mere thought of change instills fear. These criticisms, however, fail to grasp the core issue.
Vocational training can be pursued without sacrificing academic depth. Ultimately, the most capable graduates entering the workforce are those who possess strong critical thinking, clear communication, and adaptability in the face of complexity. This content does not represent soft skills. These are precisely the qualities that in-depth scholarly pursuits aim to foster. The lack is in experience.
As president of Kettering University, I've helped establish a model that blends conventional education with substantial, organized participation in the workforce. Strength This isn'an optional extra; our cooperative program is integral. This principle forms the bedrock of our approach, a tradition we've upheld for over 100 years. Our approach does not treat students as customers. We see them as nascent professionals. We do not consider employers to be donors. They are viewed as collaborators.
Established in 1919 as The School of Automobile Trades, Kettering underwent a name change to the Flint Institute of Technology prior to its acquisition by General Motors in 1926. And the General Motors Institute was renamed. For fifty years, it functioned as GM's main source for talent, cultivating numerous engineering and management leaders within its deeply ingrained system. Shared cooperation framework. Our transformation into a fully accredited university was finalized in 1945 with the introduction of a mandatory fifth-year thesis for all students. In 1982, GM divested its ownership, and by 1998, the institution was renamed Kettering University in honor of Charles F. Charles Kettering, a leading figure at GM Research and a pioneering supporter of formal cooperative education programs. Our identity remains shaped by that heritage.
Kettering students experience an alternating rhythm throughout their 4.5-year program, spending 11 weeks in rigorous academic study followed by 11 weeks of paid professional experience. Opportunities. Upon graduation, they possess two and a half years of focused professional experience and frequently earn more than $100,000. We collaborate with over 600 companies across the country, including top players in the mobility, aerospace, and autonomous systems sectors, to implement this scalable model. Here's the rewritten content: Annually, nearly all our graduates find jobs within months, frequently with their co-op partners and often in positions leading to advancement. Flaws. Over 1,500 graduates hold leadership roles in various sectors, with many occupying C-suite positions in Fortune 500 corporations.
Kettering's dedication to co-op education is more than just words. This represents a change in perspective. Our model treats industry as the client. The learner is the outcome. Our task is to create that product, ensuring it possesses both considerable intellectual substance and real-world applicability.
The most successful approach to achieving this is through cooperative education, which involves structured, supervised, paid work experiences integrated into the academic year. This idea isn'novel. With roots tracing back over a century to the University of Cincinnati, this concept has been actively supported by esteemed universities such as Northeastern, Drexel, and Antioch. Recently, educational institutions nationwide have started piloting summer internships and brief work placements in response to escalating demand.
However, not all cooperative education models are identical. For these programs to offer more than just resume entries, they need to be founded on a few essential principles.
Initially, integration with academic material is crucial, connecting these elements to the student's selected area of study. The task must be significant and overseen, not merely administrative. Third, compensation is required, and the employer must play an active role in designing the experience. Furthermore, repetition must be ample to foster mastery, not merely to increase familiarity.
This advantage is not achieved by sacrificing the liberal arts. Professional preparation is rooted in coursework covering philosophy, communication, ethics, economics, and history.
As businesses increasingly implement AI to automate routine entry-level duties, the demands placed on human employees are growing. Companies today seek graduates ready to take on demanding positions requiring significant decision-making from the outset. The demand for colleges to equip students with the skills needed for the workforce is set to grow even stronger.
For private companies, the consequences are significant. With industries encountering escalating talent deficits, the gap between what academia produces and what the economy requires has transcended being solely an educational concern. The nation's competitiveness is at stake. National policy makers are urgently emphasizing the importance of recent federal initiatives, including the CHIPS and Science Act and increased National Science Foundation funding for STEM education. Employers recognize the importance of a robust talent pipeline.
Corporate leaders have a responsibility to contribute here. Strengthening ties with universities, designing cooperative education initiatives, funding student guidance, and backing policies that encourage By implementing hands-on learning experiences, businesses can assist in bridging the skills deficit. This is a transactional exchange. It's a strategic move.
Institutions that grasp and respond to this change will shape the future of higher education. Organizations clinging to outdated beliefs will fall further behind. Institutions that embrace change will not only endure, but will also equip their students to become effective leaders.
We are educators, yet we must also be students. The current lesson is undeniable: relevance is not an entitlement; it is a reward.
Commentary published on Fortune.com represents only the perspectives of its individual authors and not necessarily the official stance or convictions Regarding Fortune.